Five tools. One research lifecycle.
Everything you need from first hypothesis to final submission.
Stop losing weeks to preventable rejections.
Laureate reviews your IRB protocol against common reviewer requirements before you submit, catching missing sections, flagging inconsistencies, and generating your consent form automatically.
- Structured protocol form with section-by-section guidance
- AI review with Required, Recommended, and Advisory severity levels
- One-click consent form and protocol document generation
Design studies that survive peer review.
Work through your research design with an AI methods consultant who knows what top journal reviewers will flag. Catch confounds, validate your manipulation, and stress-test your hypothesis before you collect a single data point.
- Research question and hypothesis refinement
- Confound identification and manipulation validity checks
- Devil's advocate review of your strongest methodological weakness
Test your study before it costs real money.
Paste your study materials and watch AI participants move through them. See where they get confused, where they would drop out, and whether your attention checks are working, before you spend grant money on real participants.
- Multiple distinct participant personas with varied attention and comprehension levels
- Dropout risk prediction and confusion point identification
- Actionable recommendations before you go live
Anticipate what reviewers will say before they say it.
Select your target journal and get feedback calibrated to what that specific venue cares about. Management Science is not AMJ is not JPSP. Laureate knows the difference.
- Journal-specific feedback for twelve top venues
- Simulated reviewer comments in the voice of actual reviewers
- Required changes versus recommended improvements clearly separated
Write proposals that match what funders expect.
Describe your project, select your funding body, and get a competitive assessment that shows you exactly where your proposal falls short, before the deadline.
- Tailored feedback for NSF, NIH, AOM, Russell Sage, Sloan, and more
- Competitiveness score with specific gap analysis
- Reviewer simulation showing both supportive and skeptical panel perspectives